Case study of Boeing Dreamliner Essay

Critical FactsBoeing is the worlds full-grownst manufacturer of military and commercial-grade-grade aircraft, which was founded in 1916 by William Boeing and Navy Engineer Conrad Westervelt in the name of Pacific Aero increases Comp all in Seattle, which later active segmenticipation in World war-I was renamed to Boeing Airplane Comp whatever (Frederick, 2014). Boeing produced some(prenominal) hundreds of B-17 Flying fortress during World contend II which became the U.S Bomber. In 1950s Boeing confront a tough competition from its opposition McDonnell-Douglas which was good at manufacturing propeller aircraft. out-of-pocket to the increased temperament of its competitor, Boeing entered into the field of manufacturing commercial Jet-aircrafts in a full-scale (Frederick, 2014).Boeing, aft(prenominal) its full-scale entry into commercial aircrafts copyled aircrafts much(prenominal) as 707, 727,737,747,767. The letters of the series from 707 to 777 begins with sevensome in terms of publicity aspect. Among these aircrafts 747 is the jumbo-jet and 777 is an aircraft intentional by completely relying on estimator technology. For each and every aircraft it had released in the commercial market, it opted for set rejuvenation (Frederick, 2014).Boeing with an intention of creating additive pry to its customers and their passengers by developing an advance(a) aircraft launched the program of 787 Dreamliner in 2003. Boeings prise creation strategy for the passengers was to reduce the age of journey and make their actuate understand remedy by re- objectiveing the aircraft and offering tender-sprung(prenominal) comforts. Dreamliner 787 is pictureed with some advanced features wish it is do of 50% of composite material, sort out weight, nons blossom flights between any reduplicate of cities without any hauls in travel (Zimmerman & S.Tang, 2009). Boeing Dreamliner with the 50% use of composite material benefitted in two distinct ways of dischar ge Efficiency and Easy main(prenominal)tenance imputable to which it is free from rust for several years.Fuselage and go mostly comprises of composite material sooner than the traditional material (Aluminum). Manufacturing of Dreamliner 787 baffling a vernal supply fibril dish up of outsourcing study extent of the components and assembling on the whole told these components by Boeing at their assembling hall. These make several Tier1 suppliers to keep up getd in these contrive much(prenominal) as Spirit, Kawasaki, Alena and Vought (BoeingCorporation, 2014). Because of complexness in supply ambit remains and lack of instruction system collaborating all the suppliers heterogeneous in the project of Dreamliner 787, made Boeing to undergo some hassles which military issueed in condition of first flight for a plosive consonant of 27 months and its delivery to the customer for a meter of 40 months. This everywhererun subjected in colossal investments of $11 billio n more than the planned investment on the Dreamliner 787 switch (Zhao, 2012).AnalysisBoeing as to increase the military operation of 787 Dreamliner, introduced a complex supply chain carry out, which integrates the best aerospace companies all around the domain to design the critical components of 787. Also it had changed its manufacturing model from a vertical model to a global henchman model. With the death penalty of these newfangled strategies Boeing want to reduce its equal and time in development, as a result of rising its market luck than that of its competitors. Boeing after moving to the new global partner model characterd several problems. As the supply chain process is dispel all over the world Boeing got into vex of coordinating with its partners. The big insecurity in this model was Boeing had to take care that all the partners involved in 787 manufacturing are visible to the info provided and also it should extradite access of the randomness about its vendors in order to chink that they are capable of delivering on-time (Danning, 2013).Boeing as a part of new supply chain process it spread its components manufacturing all over the world. So as to get incorporated with its vendors and in the process of obtaining information from them it introduced a new communication web-based tool authentic Exostar supply chain management solution. Because of this tool, Boeing cute to collaborate its partners planning schedules and progress in knead so as to ensure that no delay in manufacturing. just now Exostar which opted by Boeing posed problems during its runtime. Also as a part of cultural divergency and out-of-pocket to lack of trust on other suppliers some of the vendors involved in 787 design did not input absolute and timely information. As a result of this inaccurate information Boeing had not observed the problems at the early stages and in a timely fashion (Zhao, 2012). Boeing during 2003 lost its share value to Airbus whic h is a strong inverse to it (Boeing Corporation, 2014).In order to regain its value in the market Boeing dogged to design an aircraft by enhancing its customers.So in the process of designing a new aircraft Boeing decided to use composite carbon grapheme rather of regular aluminum to an large extent which had not been implemented in the past. Because of this composite fibers Boeing estimated to decrease the cost of travel for its passengers and to increase fuel efficiency. But this criterion backfired in getting air bubbles on the skin of fuselage and nose during assembling of aircraft which resulted in delay of 787 Dreamliner (Pearlson & Saunders, 2013) Boeing in the process of lessening in time and cost it opted a supply chain process in which it adopted from Toyota. Toyota manufactures its products with short development life history cycle with minimal chance and cost. Boeing in the same perception of minimal risk and cost opted this process. But this resulted Boeing into deep risks by lack of accurate information and incorrect delivery by its vendors (Pearlson & Saunders, 2013).The 787 Dreamliner involved clutch of technical and non-technical innovations which had not been implemented in any of aircraft manufacturing such as 70% of composite material replacing aluminum, lithium ion batteries, new systems of electrical is a huge task to achieve. While dealing with such complex and huge innovations one should involve in maximum extent of the project but whereas Boeing opted for minimal involvement by relying on its Tier1 suppliers. This resulted of increase in cost and timeline of aircraft delivery (Danning, 2013). As a part of establishing its market share with no drawn-out duration it implemented global manufacturing model which involved maximum extent of outsourcing its components design which left Boeing just with assembling the aircraft.This resulted workers at Boeing in fear of their jobs in gravel lead to usurp for 3 months. Because of t his strike it lost lots of money due to no production of work (Michael, 2012). closure The aforementioned problems are some of the main reasons of Boeing Dreamliner 787 is not delivered on time. While kickoff a new project with such huge innovations and risks every firm would be cautious by following true steps that helps the project to run in a smooth chassis without any complications in which Boeing failed to do so.RecommendationsWhile adopting a certain process from other organizations or firms it is better to know the principles and rules that are involved and need to examine the process implementation. I would recommend if Boeing would start outfollowed the same implementation process as of Toyota with pre-defined steps it would induce saved billions of dollars which would have lead Boeing into top aerospace labor While implementing a new supply chain process it is endlessly better to have face to face coordination rather than coordinating through electronic computers or on relying through some technology. I would recommend although information entered through computer will be for future mathematical function but as the process is globally spread out it would have been better if Boeing have send its employees, engineers and skilled workers to have spy on its suppliers or vendors.For any industry that is going to develop new product with forward-looking material instead of traditional material it is the responsible of that industry to perform research and experiments so as to get some digest of the innovative material and to be cautious of the problems that bone up in the future. If Boeing would have done the analysis on using composites in major part of aircraft production then no delays due to rise of air bubbles on fuselage section and on nose section.I would have recommend to hire naughty skilled workers who are having experience in aircraft industries and dispatch them to vendor location for the steerage of vendors to follow certain rul es and regulations or the standards followed Boeing. As the project involved more amounts of risk factor I would suggest Boeing would have been involved in every phase of project completion, so as to get correct updates and to speed up the work than deadline estimated, which would have resulted in rise of fame and reputation of Boeing for producing aircraft at very cheap cost than estimated.ReferencesAnupindi, R. (2011, 10 10). Case studyBoeings Dreamliner.Boeing Corporation. (2014). Boeing. Retrieved from Boeing 787 Dreamliner http//www.boeing.com/boeing/commercial/787family/background.page? Danning, S. (2013, 1 28). What Went Wrong At Boeing?Frederick, P. (2014). VIEW AMERICA WHAT TO SEE. In P. Frederick. billet america. Michael, A. J. (2012, 10 25). Boeing 787 case analysis. p. 15. Pearlson, K. E., & Saunders, C. S. (2013). Managing and Using Information Systems. John Wiley & sons. Zhao, Y. (2012). Why 787 Slips Were Inevitable. p. 16.Zimmerman, & S.Tang, C. (2009). Managing New Product development and supplychain risks. turn in chain forum, 14.